McGuinty says no to a G20 public inquiry

By ctvtoronto.ca. CTV Globe Media. 2 July, 2010.

Ontario's Premier Dalton McGuinty has said no to the idea of an independent public inquiry to review police conduct during the G20 Summit.
 
"I don't believe the circumstances warrant an inquiry," he said in an exclusive interview Friday afternoon with CTV Toronto's Paul Bliss.

"If some people have concerns, they have various avenues that are available to them."

And if any level of government should be calling an inquiry, it should be the federal government, McGuinty said.

Two marches have been held in Toronto since the two-day summit of world leaders ended Sunday.

The protesters have called for an independent inquiry and the resignation of Chief Bill Blair of the Toronto Police Service.

They accuse Blair of misleading people about police powers around the three-metre-high security fence that snaked around the Metro Toronto Convention Centre.

Police had indicated they had the power to demand people within five metres of the fence show then identification or consent to a search. If they did not, they could be arrested under the Public Works Protection Act.

The McGuinty government quietly amended the act before the summit.

As of the afternoon of Friday, June 25, Blair had been advised this was not true. However, no news release was ever issued.

Blair has said that would have been the responsibility of the G8/G20 Integrated Security Unit.

The chief has promised an internal review.

Toronto Police, the OPP, RCMP and officers from police services across Canada were involved in G20 security operations.

More than 1,000 people were arrested, but more than two-thirds were only charged with breach of peace, a very minor offence.

Some believe the police over-reacted with peaceful protest after a group of militants using so-called "black bloc" tactics engaged in vandalism, breaking windows and torching police cars.

Many have decried the conditions that existed in the Eastern Avenue temporary detention centre. The Canadian Civil Liberties Association predicts many lawsuits will be filed and says that the McGuinty government owes the Ontario public an apology.

Demands for a Public Independent Inquiry into Police Conduct at the G20 Summit

Hundreds of allegations have been made against Toronto police in regards to police violence and threats during the mass arrests that took place during the G20 protests in Toronto. Male officers have also been accused of using sexual threats against the women detained.  An independent public inquiry has been called for by various labour, community and student groups.

Links:

CASAC/ACCCACS Letter of Support for an independent public inquiry.  8 July 2010.

McGuinty says no to a G20 public inquiry. By ctvtoronto.ca. CTV Globe Media, 2 July, 2010.

Watch this video of independent journalist Amy Miller on Violence and Threats Against Women in Detention Centre. 

Amy Miller - Alternative Media Centre, Independent Journalist from Darren Puscas on Vimeo.

Time to act on domestic violence: watchdog

by Dirk Meissner
Victoria - The Canadian Press, June 2, 2010

It's time for the B.C. government to move from talking about fighting domestic violence to implementing reforms that could save lives, says the province's children's representative.

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond's comments came Tuesday after yet another report that calls for the development of a unified approach to combat domestic violence.

“These issues require leadership,” Ms. Turpel-Lafond said. “They require resources. They require improving policy and systems in British Columbia where they don't exist. So, they are tough.”

In the past 10 months, the Liberal government has received three separate reports related to the need for more government action on domestic violence.

Tuesday's report from a coroner's death review panel made 19 recommendations after a review of 29 domestic-violence deaths in British Columbia.

Among the recommendations, the panel said domestic violence cases should be fast-tracked through the courts and there should be a specific designation for cases involving a high risk of serious harm or death.

The panel also called on the province to ensure swift justice for accused abusers.

The September 2007 murder-suicide deaths of five members of a Victoria-area family yielded two major domestic-violence reports aimed at the government.

Six-year-old Christian Lee was stabbed to death by his father, Peter Lee, who also murdered his wife Sunny, and her parents in a fit over the family's breakup.

Peter Lee, who weeks earlier tried to kill his wife in a staged car accident, was on bail and under court order to stay away from the family home when he climbed through a basement window and committed the murders before killing himself.

The inquest jury made several recommendations in December 2009, including calling for the creation of a provincewide domestic violence unit, tighter bail restrictions for accused offenders and the development of a public domestic violence campaign that includes an elementary school program.

In September 2009, Ms. Turpel-Lafond released an 88-page report on the death of Christian Lee, noting that the family crossed paths with many service providers, including three police departments, social workers, medical staff, Crown counsel, two therapists and several lawyers.

But the experienced and professional bodies were not working together, and a human tragedy followed, the report said. It found that there was no communication or co-ordination between the child welfare and criminal justice systems.

Ms. Turpel-Lafond

said a co-ordinated system linking the criminal, child welfare and family justice systems could have made a difference.

The death review panel called for the agencies named in the report, including government ministries, the chiefs of police, law society and chief coroner, to respond to the recommendations by June 30.

The panel wanted more consistency and better information sharing between government agencies dealing with domestic violence cases.

The recommendations come from a study of 11 domestic violence incidents in British Columbia between 1995 and 2009.

The panel noted that a 2008 B.C. Coroner's Service review of 605 homicides between January 2003 and August 2008 found that 73 were domestic-violence deaths that included 55 females and 18 males.

“I want to now move from the ‘We have to study it and review it stage,' to the ‘We need to go forward with implementation,'” Ms. Turpel-Lafond said. “The tide is really turning where ... what we want to see is where is the progress.”

Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/time-to-act-on-domestic-violence-watchdog/article1588992/?cmpid=rss1

Canada conducts Death Panel Reviews relating to Violence Against Women

In an effort to address spousal homicide, some provinces have taken a prevention approach by examining past domestic violence cases in the hopes of making recommendations to the chief coroner.  These advisory committees, known as “death panels,” aim to identify the trends and conditions that lead to death, and how to prevent domestic violence.

Links:

New Brunswick reviews domestic violence deaths. CBC News. February 17, 2010

Report to the Chief Coroner of British Columbia: Findings and Recommendations of the Domestic Violence Death Review Panel. May 2010

Time to act on domestic violence: watchdog. Dirk Meissner, Victoria, Canadian Press.  June 2, 2010

N.B. reviews domestic violence deaths

CBC News, February 17, 2010

New Brunswick will begin analyzing all deaths resulting from domestic violence to find ways to prevent future tragedies.

The Department of Public Safety announced last week that a new 11-person domestic violence death review committee has been struck and it will act as an advisory body to the Office of the Chief Coroner.

The committee will begin reviewing the circumstances leading up to these deaths, take note of any risk factors or trends, and make recommendations.

Martine Stewart, the director of violence prevention initiatives with the province's women's issues branch, said it's hoped the analysis will lead to intervention in similar cases down the road.

"My first thought would be ultimately to prevent them, to learn from them and be able to assist family members that go through this," Stewart said.

"But ultimately, it's the prevention of death and the prevention of domestic violence in general."

Once it reviews a domestic homicide, the committee will make recommendations to the chief coroner.

Jérôme Ouellette, the province's acting deputy chief coroner and chair of the new committee, said once the panel submits its recommendations the chief coroner will send them to the relevant government agencies and departments.

The recommendations will be made public in the chief coroner's annual report.

New Brunswick isn't the first province to set up a committee to review these deaths.

The Ontario government also has a domestic violence death review committee. The British Columbia government also announced in January that it was creating a similar domestic violence death review panel.

New Brunswick has a child death review committee that probes the deaths of children younger than 19, who were in the legal care of the Department of Social Development or whose families were in contact with the child protection system within 12 months prior to their death.

The absence of a domestic death review committee was highlighted in the case of John McKendy, the popular St. Thomas University professor who was killed on Oct. 31, 2008.

McKendy's son-in-law was charged with first-degree murder, but he killed himself before police could catch him.

Reviewing deaths

Now that New Brunswick's domestic violence death review committee is operating, it has commissioned an analysis of domestic violence deaths in the province form 1999 to 2008.

Carmen Gill, the director of the Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research in Fredericton, said the idea is to prevent similar deaths from happening in the future.

"We know each time when there's a homicide, it's a unique situation," Gill said. "That's clear to everyone.

"But is there a pattern we can find among those cases that can be learned so we can learn from those deaths and better intervene in the future."


Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2010/02/17/nb-domestic-violence-review-committee-548.html#ixzz0qUJXVPd7
 

 

Protesting against Bill C-3: The AMUN March 2010

Since 1985, Sharon McIvor has fought for gender equality in the Indian Act, which discriminates against Aboriginal Women as bearers of Status.  Recently, Bill C-3 continues to perpetuate these inequalities.

The 500 kilometer AMUN ("Big Gathering) March, led by Michèle Audette and Viviane Michel, is aimed at protesting Bill C-3.

Links:

Sharon McIvor's Recent Letter to Member's of Parliament. Dated May 18th, 2010.

Kickoff of the 500 kilometer AMUN March denouncing injustices of the Indian Act towards Aboriginal Families. By First Perspective News. May 5th, 2010.

AMUN March in Montreal: pictures (demotix.com) A collection of photographs taken of the march. Photographs by Olivier Chwaiki. May 18th, 2010.

Canadian Women's March 2005 Coalition

What is the Canadian Women's March 2005 Coalition? 

We are 10 national women’s and social justice groups committed to the elimination of poverty and violence in Canada and to making the links between local and global actions. We were involved in World March of Women in 2000. We are committed to continuing our work to meet the 13 demands developed in 2000 to eliminate poverty and violence against women in Canada. We are members of the World March of Women 2005 - an international movement of women.
 
In 2000, as part of the Canadian Women’s March Committee, we supported a political platform called It’s Time for Change containing 13 practical demands for the elimination of poverty and violence in Canada and supported the global demands as well. Our 13 demands were presented to the Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien and then finance minister, Paul Martin and to leaders of the Liberal, Progressive Conservative, Bloc Québecois and New Democratic Party. Today, major investments on social programs are still needed and none of the 13 demands have been met.
 
What is The Canadian Women’s March 2005 Coalition doing?
We are pressuring the federal government to implement the 13 demands of the 2000 March. We are part of the international relay of the Global Women’s Charter for Humanity. The Charter is based on five key values: equality, freedom, solidarity, justice and peace. It provides a feminist vision of a world where exploitation, oppression, intolerance and exclusion no longer exist and where integrity, diversity and the rights and freedoms of all are respected. Through our actions in 2005 and the publication of this Charter, we reiterate our belief in a world filled with hope and life, a world that is truly a good place to live.
 
On International Women’s Day 2005, women will gather in Sao Paulo Brazil to officially launch the Global Women’s Charter for Humanity. The Global Charter will be relayed by women’s groups from country to country around the world.
 
Women in Vancouver will be the first Canadians to receive The Women's Global Charter for Humanity when the coalition delegation arrives from the United States on Sunday May 1, 2005. Canadian women will travel to the border to receive the Charter. The Charter will be celebrated a part of reminding the Canadian government of the Feminist 13 Demands around which Canadian women are united. The Charter will be celebrated along the route. Already major actions are being planned in Vancouver, Yellowknife, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Moncton and Quebec City. 
 
We will update this webpage with information about the relay of the Global Charter and the Canadian Demands across Canada as they develop. For further information contact CASAC at 604-876-2622 or e-mail mailto:casac02@shaw.ca
 
 
VIEW HIGHLIGHTS: World March of Women's Global Chater for Humanity in Vancouver May 1, 2005